En français
The Office for Central and
Eastern Europe Initiatives
| The Challenge
The transformation of Eastern Europe and the countries of the Commonwealth
of Independent States (CIS) after the collapse of the Soviet Union has
been much more difficult and painful than imagined. By 1997, incomes had declined to the point that 120 million people
about a third of the region's population lived below a poverty line of US$4 a day. Conditions in Ukraine, once an
economic mainstay of the Soviet Union, reflect some of the challenges faced by these countries in their transition to
democracy and a market
economy.
In the eight years since Ukraine's independence, the country has fallen from
45 to 102 in the United Nations Development Program ranking of countries, according to indicators that measure the
quality of life. Death rates have climbed and estimates of people living in poverty range up to 70%. Unemployment,
housing shortages, inadequate diets, smoking, alcoholism, and a crisis in health care have contributed to these statistics, as
have severe environmental problems. Fallout from the Chernobyl disaster and high levels of air and water pollution mean
that 70% of Ukrainians live in areas
considered environmentally dangerous.
A massive effort, akin to that offered to Africa, Asia, and Latin America, is needed to help Ukraine and its neighbours in
Central and Eastern Europe
in their struggle to rebuild their devastated societies.
The Response
The Office for Central and Eastern Europe Initiatives (OCEEI) was established in 1993 as a unit within IDRC to develop
and manage Centre activities in the region. Its inception reflected a shift in Canadian foreign policy, which called for a
Canadian presence and program of assistance in Eastern Europe and CIS countries to help in the transition process.
OCEEI is well placed to support this process. In working with partners
in Central and Eastern Europe, OCEEI draws on IDRC's 29 years of
experience in the developing world and its global network of contacts and resources. It also offers technical expertise,
project management, help in building research networks, and support services. Its approach is based on enhancing the
knowledge and skills of local researchers so that they can target and address issues of critical importance to their countries.
For example, OCEEI has trained Ukranian personnel to identify ways to reduce waste in polluting industries by conducting
environmental audits. The training has lead to the formation of a Ukranian nongovernmental organization to carry out these
audits. This kind of capacity building ensures that countries like Ukraine can capitalize on their own resources to move
ahead in the new directions demanded by political, economic, and social reforms.
The Objectives
To find innovative solutions to problems in Eastern and Central Europe
in collaboration with local research partners.
To undertake research that aims to enhance the quality of life for people
in the region.
To support the process of political, economic, and social reform.
To foster links between societies in Canada and in Eastern and Central Europe.
The Results
In 1991, Canada was the first Western country to recognize Ukraine's independence and to extend an offer of technical
assistance. The Environmental Management Development in Ukraine program, a massive clean-up effort for the Dnipro
River Basin, was the first Canadian initiative in the country and continues to be the largest. (Featured project)
IDRC founded Cooperation House in Kyiv to provide logistical support and office services to a number of Ukrainian
and Canadian organizations working on development projects in the country. Pooling resources and information under one
roof saves time, money, and effort, and strengthens the organizations' impact.
An environmental audit of a meat-packing plant in Vatutio found inadequate water supplies and an excessive discharge
of fat and organic waste into the municipal sewer system. Measures introduced to solve these problems have saved the
plant US$79 000 in one year and cut down on pollution.
Local and national stations in Ukraine, as well as an international television network, have broadcast a series of public
education videos on the environ-ment of the Dnipro River. Discussions have been held about airing the videos in Canada.
A new program for pumping well water in Kherson, Ukraine, has eliminaed the saline contamination of the city's water
supply.
|
Water Rescue
 | A Canadian initiative helps to clean up Ukraine's most important
and most
polluted river.
The Dnipro River is the Nile of Ukraine, providing irrigation, hydroelectric energy, a transportation route, and 70% of the
country's drinking water. Its beauty inspired Cossacks of old to call it "God's Heaven on Earth." Today, however, pollution
levels in the Dnipro have created some hellish problems.
Radiation from the Chernobyl disaster, heavy applications of pesticides and herbicides, industrial pollution, and untreated
sewage from municipalities have all combined to make the waters of the Dnipro a toxic current. Its contamination has
contributed to Ukraine's status as one of the most environmentally degraded republics of the former Soviet Union. Since
Ukraine has limited sources of fresh water, cleaning up the river is one of the country's top
priorities.
A program funded by the Canadian International Development Agency and managed by IDRC is helping to do just that.
The first phase of the Environmental Management Development in Ukraine (EMDU) program generated more than 60
activities, which ranged from cleaning polluted water and controlling water quality to providing technical and scientific
assistance to Ukrainian personnel and educating the public about environmental problems. The program's initiatives include
the introduction of "green" technologies to polluting industries, the use of environmental audits to improve water and
energy management, and the completion of an important baseline water-quality study that lays the scientific groundwork
for rehabilitating the river. |
 A Chernobyl victim receives treatment; Ukraine remains one of the most environmentally degraded
republics of the former Soviet Union. |
Zaporizhzhya, a city in southern Ukraine, was singled out for immediate attention because it suffers from severe problems
with pollution and water availability. An estimated 50% of the waste water collected in the city bypasses treatment plants
and is dumped into the Dnipro. To help save water and reduce sewage, a pilot project installed 1 400 reconditioned water
meters donated by the City of Edmonton. Experience shows that when water is metered, consumers are more likely to
conserve water and pay their bills and authorities have a greater incentive to detect and repair leaks in water mains.
EMDU, however, provides more than the nuts and bolts of pollution control and water conservation it also addresses the
mechanics of institutional reform, namely overcoming the Soviet legacy of inefficient central planning and policymaking. |
 Nearly 20 billion cubic
metres of untreated effluent the equivalent of one-third
of the Dnipro's annual flow
is dumped into the river each year. Environmental audits
can help to reduce this waste. |
This legacy meant that there was considerable duplication of effort among Ukrainian institutions. Three agencies would
typically be responsible for identical work, such as measuring water quality. Each used different standards, however,
making comparisons impossible. Data was often hoarded, part of a culture of secrecy left over from the Soviet government.
EMDU once had to buy satellite maps of Ukraine from Canadian sources because
the Ukrainian versions were considered state secrets.
In contrast, EMDU has promoted collaboration and the sharing of information by bringing together Ukrainian experts who
used to work independently. For example, three institutions cooperated in conducting the baseline water-quality survey and
in developing a joint action plan based on their findings. EMDU also works to improve management practices in Ukrainian
institutions and organizations. Its efforts with the Zaporizhzhia Vodokanal, the agency responsible for the water supply and
waste treatment in the municipality, have made the city eligible for a loan from the European Bank for Reconstruction and
Development to modernize its utilities. Finally, the
program has helped Ukrainian authorities establish their own management committee to review and prioritize proposals for
research projects on the river. The selected projects are then suggested to IDRC for funding.
This "learning by doing" strategy reflects IDRC's years of experience in
helping people find their own solutions to problems in the developing world. EMDU has successfully transferred the
approach to Eastern Europe, where existing scientific and technical capacity has accelerated the learning process. The
model has been hailed by Ukrainian authorities, including Prime Minister Valery Pustovoitenko, and EMDU has been
formally recognized in Ukraine's National Environmental Plan, adopted by the country's parliament in February 1998.
|

EMDU supported Ukraine's Institute of Colloidal Chemistry's development of equipment for cleaning tap water. |
|
Future Directions
EMDU's achievements are important milestones in the cleanup of the Dnipro River. But the enormity of the task and the
political and economic environment still pose tremendous challenges to the rehabilitation effort, which could take as long
as 40 years. To signal Canada's commitment
to the initiative, EMDU entered a second phase in October 1997. The second phase has narrowed the focus to areas with a
greater chance of reform, such as water toxicology, public outreach, drinking water quality, and environmental audits
centered on plants in the heavily industrialized Zaporizhzhia-Dnipropetrovsk corridor.
OCEEI is expanding its programing beyond Ukraine as part of an
agreement with the United Nations Development Programme to help
rehabilitate the Dnipro River in Russia and Belarus through a Global Environmental Facility project.
Further Reading
|
Copyright 1999 © International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada
info@idrc.ca | 15 August 1999
Contents < Previous section - Top of page
- Next section >
|