Highly toxic fungicide
Phase-out schedules
Replacing methyl bromide
Environmental and economic benefits
More links to explore...
Spanish version of this article

Agricultural worker spraying pesticides on crops
Saving the Ozone Layer: Alternatives to Methyl Bromide
One of the main threats to the Earth's ozone layer today
is a potent pesticide called methyl bromide that plays a pivotal role in
Southern cash-crop economies. However, a recent report by Friends
of the Earth, an international environmental organization, suggests
that viable alternatives to methyl bromide exist and can be adopted at
minimal cost to producers.
The report, entitled The Technical and Economic Feasibility of
Replacing Methyl Bromide in Developing Countries, presents the results
of an international research project that examined methyl bromide use patterns
in Zimbabwe, Thailand and Chile; compared the costs and yields of alternatives;
identified the most technically feasible ones, where possible; and assessed
the barriers and opportunities for adopting cost-effective substitutes.
The study was funded by the International Development Research Centre (IDRC),
the US Environmental Protection Agency, Environment Canada, Swiss Agency
for Development and Cooperation, Friends of the Earth USA, Friends of the
Earth Canada, and Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
Highly toxic fungicide
Methyl bromide is a highly toxic fungicide and the second most widely applied
pesticide in the world. It is primarily used on "high value"
export crops bound for North America, European, and East Asian markets,
such as tomatoes, peppers, grapes, strawberries, tobacco and flowers. Methyl
bromide is also used to protect stored grains. The pesticide is effective
against a wide range of pests including insects, worms, and pathogenic
microorganisms.
However, methyl bromide has a dramatic environmental impact. After being
sprayed on crops, the pesticide drifts into the upper atmosphere where
it damages the ozone layer, which blocks ultraviolet (UV) rays from reaching
the Earth's surface. Although a shorter-lived substance than chlorofluorocarbons
(CFCs) — a better-known family of ozone-depleting compounds — methyl bromide
destroys ozone molecules at 50 times the rate of CFCs. In a 1994 scientific
assessment, the World Meteorological Organization
concluded that phasing out this chemical is the single largest step that
governments can take to protect the ozone layer.
Phase-out schedules
In 1995, industrialized countries agreed to phase out their production
and consumption of methyl bromide by the year 2010, under the United Nations
Montreal
Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. However, Southern
nations have been more reluctant to commit to phase-out schedules, because
of the importance of this chemical to their agricultural economies. The
dilemma faced by Southern exporters is that foreign markets will only import
agricultural commodities that have been treated for pests and pathogens.
The study found that in Zimbabwe, methyl bromide is used on 98% of the
nation's tobacco crop, which had an export value of US$530 million in 1994-95.
The pesticide is also used to grow flowers, paprika, fruits and vegetables.
In Chile, methyl bromide is mainly used on tomatoes and peppers.
Replacing methyl bromide
The Friends of the Earth report noted that there is no single replacement
for methyl bromide, but rather a variety of options, depending on the crop
or application. For some fruit and vegetable crops, farmers could adopt
a system of integrated pest management involving tools such as pest-resistant
plant varieties, crop rotation, natural plant-based pesticides, and beneficial
microbes. In other cases, steam treatment may be more appropriate. Studies
have shown that this technique — which involves heating water to 150 degrees
Celsius and applying it to soils — can be as effective as methyl bromide,
at half the price.
For shipping purposes, the report recommends the use of controlled atmospheres
that filter all of the gases found in air except nitrogen, thus killing
insects by asphyxiation. Other options include the use of hot water dips,
steam, hot dry air, or cold treatments for protection against fungal and
other infestations.
Environmental and economic
benefits
The report suggests that the adoption of alternatives to methyl bromide
would not only benefit the environment but may also generate economic growth.
"One of the major opportunities is the development of new industries
in developing countries to supply local and export markets with alternative
products and services," it states.
Jacinda Fairholm is a student and member of the Canadian Environmental
Network Youth Caucus, who lives in Vancouver.
Sidebar:
Human and Economic Costs of Ozone Depletion
Resource Persons:
Beatrice Olivastri, Friends of the Earth Canada, 47 Clarence
Street, Suite 306, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 9K1, Canada; Tel: (613) 241-0085,
ext. 24; Fax: (613) 241-7998; E-mail: foe@intranet.ca
Melanie Miller, Environmental Policy Analyst, New Zealand; E-mail:
m-miller@ramhb.co.nz
Miquel Stuzin, INIA Agricultural Research Institute, Santiago, Chile;
E-mail: info@codeft.mic.cl
Anne Shonfield, Methyl Bromide Alternative Network and Pesticide
Action Network, 116 New Montgomery No. 810, San Francisco, CA, 94105, USA;
Tel: (415) 541-9140; Fax: (415) 541-9253; E-mail: panna@igc.apc.org
Kelly Sims, Ozone Action Inc., 1621 Connecticut Ave
NW, Washington DC, 20009, USA; Tel: (202) 265-6738; Fax: (202) 332-4865;
E-mail: ozone_action@essential.org
Links to explore ...
- Related IDRC articles and publications:
- Integrated
Pest Management for Colombian Small Farmers, by David Mowbray
- Return to Resistance: Breeding
Crops to Reduce Pesticide Dependence
- Women
and Integrated Pest Management
- Additional resources:
- Campaign
Against Methyl Bromide: Ozone-killing Pesticide Opposed
- Methyl Bromide
- Methyl Bromide and
Stratospheric Ozone Depletion
- The Ozone
Secretariat WWW Home Page
- Selected
References on Pesticides and Pest Management
IDRC Reports is published weekly on-line by the International
Development Research Centre.
Its aim is to keep an international readership informed about the work
IDRC supports in developing countries as well as other development issues
of interest.
Back to IDRC Homepage
Back to IDRC Reports
Page
Updated April 11, 1997. Please send your comments to editor
of Reports.
Copyright 1997 © International Development
Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada
info@idrc.ca | April
11, 1997
Resources
| Research Programs
| The Institution
| CRDI en français
|